Determining Manufacturer Fault In Product Liability

One of the parties that can be held liable in a product liability claim is the manufacturer of the product. They serve as the starting point before the products are sent to the market for purchase by customers. It is the job of the manufacturer to ensure that products are fully tested before they are sold. According to the website of Abel Law Firm, faulty designed or built products can pose a serious hazard to consumers.

Under the Consumer Protection Act, if a product defect resulted to the death, injury, or damage to private property, the relatives of the plaintiff or any representative may push forward a product liability claim. Such actions are designed to compensate for economic or consequential loss. Product liability claims are based on the assumption that the manufacturer owes a duty of care to everyone who will make use of its product. Manufacturers may be held liable for negligence for the following reasons:

  • Failure to exercise care during the manufacturing process, which caused a particular product to be defective
  • Failure to ensure the safety of the product’s design, which may also include the lack of sufficient and careful research
  • Failure to carry out effective tests
  • Failure to provide effective warning of danger
  • Failure to recall a product or issue appropriate warnings amidst apparent danger after the product has been circulated

The liability will not be limited to the manufacturer alone. Even those who supplied components or acted as distributors of the product may also have some accountability if it is proven that they also showed negligence. The problem is that product liability is restricted by certain limitations, the liability of the manufacturer is only limited to where it has failed to take reasonable care, which needs to be proven by the plaintiff. This will not only prove costly but also difficult.

Read More

Entertainment/Recreation for the Elderly

Sometimes, it’s not only diseases that can kill the elderly. Sometimes, it’s loneliness.

Miriam Beames, whose cat had died in 2015, only had praises for the robotic “companion pet” cat manufactured by Pawtucket, Rhode Island-based toy company Hasbro, saying, “Feeling the purr is really nice.” Indeed, Hasbro has found the perfect business opportunity in its Joy For All line of toys as the population of senior citizens in the United States and the whole world starts to rise.

Aside from Hasbro’s toy for the elderly, there is also a Japanese-designed robotic seal called Paro which aims at bringing delight and serve as a muscle memory tool for elderly citizens afflicted with Alzheimer’s disease. Paro, which is valued at around $5,000, Paro is used as a medical toy in hospitals all around the world but mostly in the United Kingdom’s National Health Service. Paros are also available in nursing homes in Britain.

Doctors say the elderly who care for something – for instance, their grandchildren, or a pet – lead much more fulfilling lives because their thoughts turn away from the fact that most days they need assisted care.

According to Hasbro vice president of business development Ted Fischer, taking care of a pet is also good for the elderly because there is a “relational memory” of when they were young, for most of them took care of pets during that stage in their lives; thereby presenting them with a pet to take care of helps jog their memory as they age further. Fischer added that they are developing designs for more animal pets, with them eyeing the development of robotic dogs soon.

SeniorAdvice.com says that truly, taking care of a pet is one way for senior citizens to keep their minds sharp, their bodies thriving, and their spirits high, aside from engaging in outdoor activities and playing games like puzzles, board games with family and friends and investing their time in a hobby such as bird watching, crocheting, among others.

Read More

Handling Children Within A Divorce

Getting divorced with children makes it appear to be a walk-in the park compared, although finding separated without children is near a nice experience. Household dilemmas are tough and it is burdensome the parties involved to see a marriage end for all. It’s not soft to predict how your youngster can answer the news of the divorce. There are ways you can try cushion the strike, although it will differ depending on persona and era.

Do not examine information on the divorce unless they right refer for them. Do they have to realize who is their principal service for FAFSA types? Of course. But preserve the achievable added animosity produced in the divorce between the two of your process as well as other activities like how the money was split up. The past issue your child needs right now is to question the decisions of both parents or 1. They must be surrounded with as much positivity as you can. That being said, retain it out-of eyesight, in the event you and your soon to be ex get into battles and earshot of your kid.

There is a difficult approach of the manner in which you two will manage things like custody, visitation rights, and where your child may go-to institution when you inform your youngster, but inform them that issues have the ability to alter whenever they don’t just like the settlement the two of you stumbled on. According to the website of the Raleigh family law attorneys of Marshall & Taylor, working out the facts of a child custody agreement could be emotionally charged, but keep in mind that the less load you put-on your child, the better the partnership with them is likely to be along with the much more likely you will view them, especially when they grow old.

Attorneys will say, “Successfully handling differences in a divorce needs a gentle balance between delivering for the best interests of the family and kids and simultaneously shielding your interests being an individual.”

Read More

Long-term Payment Plans for Personal Injury Claims

A majority of personal injury claim often choose to have out-of-court settlement for a number of reasons. Settling out-of-court can save both parties from unnecessary expenses and valuable time that long court proceedings often demand. When negotiation occurs for injury claims, it is often understood that the payment would be given in a lump sum. What not many people know is that payment for the compensation can also come in long-term payment plans. Rather than a lump sum payment, some plaintiffs choose to have a structured payment plan that can span over a certain period of time.

Structured payments are a settlement payment plan that both the claimant and the defendant has agreed upon. Some of the settlement will be given in a lump sum, while the rest of the compensation will be a structured payment over an agreed amount of time. When both parties have agreed to the terms of the structured payment, the defendant (or their insurance company) will be responsible of transferring parts of the structured settlement to a separate insurer, typically a life insurance company who practices structured settlement payments.

A number of things can be negotiated and included in a structured settlement, such as the amount of payment to be received and the schedule of payment, the length of the payment plan, whether the lump sum is given at the end or if the payments will end after death or handed over to next of kin. These, and many other factors, can be arranged between the plaintiff and defendant, but it is important for the plaintiff to ensure that the company that will provide the payment is reputable and highly rated. This minimizes the risk of the company going bankrupt or fail, prompting the structured payments to stop. Just as with any negotiation and settlement, there are risks involved when choosing structured payment. Talking with a personal injury lawyer about the possibility of structured payment can help in lowering these risks and work out the best payment plan for the case.

Read More

Aortic Stenosis with Depakote Use

Medical terms always make the essentially simple sound incredibly complex. Take for example congenital aortic stenosis, which may or may not be caused by the mother taking Depakote during the first trimester of pregnancy. Aortic stenosis simply means the valve is narrow on one end, causing some of the blood that should be going out into the aorta (the main blood vessel hat distributes blood and oxygen to the body) goes back into the heart (backflow). Some babies are born with one, two, or four tissue flaps called leaflets that prevent backflow instead of the normal three, and this can make the aortic valve less efficient in keeping the blood from going back in. So in simple terms, the heart has a leaky valve.

Congenital aortic stenosis will not always make life difficult for the baby at once, unless it is really severe. In such cases, the baby may die within two years from congestive heart failure. In many cases, the complications associated with having blood leak back into the heart may not manifest until adulthood, and the only way to fix it is to replace the valve. Symptoms of aortic stenosis include fainting spells, shortness of breath when physically active, and chest pains. Aortic stenosis is detectable in asymptomatic patients during a routine physical examination.

The link between maternal ingestion of Depakote and congenital aortic stenosis has not been established in any study. According to the website of Williams Kherkher, Depakote is associated with many birth defects. Depakote (valproate) is known to interfere with the development of the fetus by blocking some actions of the fetal DNA. It has been more closely associated with anencephaly, where the fetus is born with an underdeveloped skull and brain. In some cases, it is speculated that its effects may extend beyond the first trimester, as in hydranencephaly, where the developed cerebral hemispheres of the brain are deprived of oxygen. This results in cell death and eventual resorption. It does not take much to imagine that such systemic interference may lead to cardiac malformations as well.

If you or your child was born with aortic stenosis, and Depakote is in the picture, you may have a case against the drug’s manufacturer.

Read More